Slideshow essay on the building of an unbuilt FLW (LA Times)

ARCHITECTURE AND PRESERVATION NEWS for the Los Angeles Conservancy Modern Committee (ModCom) and other Mid Century Modern, Googie, International, Art Deco, 20th Century design

Moderators: I_LUV_POWER!!!!, Joe, Adriene, moderns-r-us, Tony, Futura Girl, sean, Josh Geidel, nichols, Java

User avatar
scowsa
Modern Guru
Posts: 1366
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:47 pm
Location: Culver City, CA

Slideshow essay on the building of an unbuilt FLW (LA Times)

Postby scowsa » Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:16 pm

"Three years ago, Times staff writer Diane Haithman traveled to Lake Mahopac, N.Y., to report on a retired contractor's attempt at a rare feat: to take one of Frank Lloyd Wright’s unbuilt designs and construct it exactly as Wright intended. Haithman recently went back to see the finished house and spoke with its owner. What follows is a photo tour of the home believed to be the first, since the architect's death, to rise on its intended site."

scowsa

User avatar
rockland
Mondo Lounge Lizard
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 8:45 am
Location: wesley hills,NY

Postby rockland » Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:09 pm

Could someone please photo-shop and remove the velcro plant-on
rocky bits. Such an incredible house, but i can't see it past the one
giant flaw...and it is everywhere, except the one bedroom which is lovely.

This house has gotten so much press since last fall. The defending of the
'rocky bits' seems to dominate most articles.

User avatar
ch
Special Secret Modern Agent
Posts: 696
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 8:31 am
Location: CT

Postby ch » Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:10 pm

Oddly underwhelming. The rock/morter thing just looks wrong. The red floors seem kind of garish too - not as subdued as in older Wright homes. Despite the wood and stone the rooms seem sterile and barren. Hard to put my finger on it but it just doesn't work for me.

User avatar
johnnyapollo
Special Secret Modern Agent
Posts: 632
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:28 pm
Location: Atlanta GA
Contact:

Postby johnnyapollo » Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:12 am

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."
Philip K. Dick

Desperately Seeking Modern
http://modernseeker.blogspot.com

Josquin
Most Illustrious Grand Member
Most Illustrious Grand Member
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 1:38 pm
Location: La Crescenta Valley, CA

Rocky Bits

Postby Josquin » Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:40 am

I have to agree, the rocky bits are most unsettling. Perhaps the red concrete will mellow with age.

egads
Mondo Lounge Lizard
Posts: 1671
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:25 pm
Location: Long Beach CA

Postby egads » Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:59 am

Does anyone have any information on the stuck on rocks? Is it just bad owner taste? Do you suppose those walls were supposed to be like Taliesin West? But the local building authorities would not allow it? And this is the way the owner "interpreted" that look? It's really a puzzle. I guess the next owner can chisel them off.

As to the floors, in the pictures they look painted. But if they are in fact colored concrete, it will fade in time. Unless of course the owner decided to use some new extreme process that holds color better. Often for the very rich, too much is just enough. They seemed to have missed the gluttony memo. :D

User avatar
rockland
Mondo Lounge Lizard
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 8:45 am
Location: wesley hills,NY

Postby rockland » Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:27 am

It appears to be painted. I don't remember the red one the exterior
concrete in earlier photos. And it is wearing off in areas already. A
concrete stain is always a better option, or even better, mix it into
the concrete early on. I believe it can be added after the pour, mixed
into the top layer when troweling. (a challenge to get it even)

Such a bright red usually fades to a pink, but in this instance i think it
may wear off before it gets a chance. What a mess.
A little burnt umber and dot of black in the paint may have been a
better choice.

Paint companies make such great claims when it comes to addhession,
but something went wrong and most likely the prepping of the surface
before painting...

User avatar
johnnyapollo
Special Secret Modern Agent
Posts: 632
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:28 pm
Location: Atlanta GA
Contact:

Postby johnnyapollo » Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:29 am

It says in the article that he's gotten a lot of criticism on the rocks - seems he used the natural stone from the island and had to jut them out due to "required" insulation in the walls. I feel they could have been done better, plus he could have back cut the stone for all that.

-- John
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."

Philip K. Dick



Desperately Seeking Modern

http://modernseeker.blogspot.com

Josquin
Most Illustrious Grand Member
Most Illustrious Grand Member
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 1:38 pm
Location: La Crescenta Valley, CA

Wrightesque house.

Postby Josquin » Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:30 am

A thorough discussion of this topic is at this Wright Chat site:

http://www.savewright.org/wright_chat/v ... .php?t=625

User avatar
rockland
Mondo Lounge Lizard
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 8:45 am
Location: wesley hills,NY

Postby rockland » Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:34 am

thanks Josquin, i was just looking for that...

User avatar
rockland
Mondo Lounge Lizard
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 8:45 am
Location: wesley hills,NY

Postby rockland » Sat Jun 14, 2008 8:29 am



Return to “Mid Century Modern Preservation Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests